When considering how leadership is defined in societies it is common to see it portrayed as a competition, for power and status creating winners and losers. This viewpoint, ingrained in ideology impacts various aspects of our society from politics to business practices. However Johan Huizingas examination of "play" in culture in his book Homo Ludens offers a perspective on the essence of leadership. Huizinga suggests that play is an element of civilization that influences different areas such as art and governance. Contrasting this with leadership traditions encourages me to view leadership not as a quest for dominance but as an effort.
The Playful Aspect of Western Leadership; Lessons from Huizinga
Huizingas study, on the element highlights the role that play plays in societal progress beyond mere amusement. In cultures however this idea of play has often transformed into a narrative where leadership equates to triumph—a narrative deeply woven into the historical and cultural tapestry of the West.
From the battles of Rome to day corporate offices I've noticed that leadership has always been, about success, power and influence in different time periods.
I've observed that Western leadership often emphasizes competition in how its taught and practiced. Leadership training courses typically focus on planning, outsmarting competitors. Achieving goals even if it means surpassing others. While this approach can work well in situations I believe it might not lead to a model of leadership in the long run. It creates environments where a leaders success depends on their ability to dominate and control than collaboration.
On the hand I've seen that many indigenous communities see leadership as centered around cooperation and the well being of everyone which is a departure from Western ideals. In these societies leaders focus on guiding the group maintaining harmony and ensuring the welfare of all members than asserting authority over them. According to Huizingas perspective this kind of leadership is characterized by playfulness— not as a form of leisure but as an creative effort.
For instance among Aboriginal Australians leadership is often represented by Elders chosen for their wisdom, experience and skill, in leading the community while respecting all members and their surroundings.
In this context I notice that leadership leans more, towards stewardship than power dynamics; the leader serves as a guide than a dictator. This approach resonates well with Huizingas perspective on play as an activity where the leader promotes being of engaging in a power struggle.
Likewise upon studying the Iroquois Confederacy renowned for its impact on governance I see that it emphasizes decision making and the value placed on future generations. Leaders are selected based on their ability to listen conflicts and nurture agreement – showcasing an approach to leadership centered on collaboration than Western ideas of supremacy.
Within African Bushmen communities I observe that choices are guided by consensus than imposition with leadership shared and occasionally flexible. Here leadership is viewed as a service to the community; the leaders responsibility is to ensure all voices are heard and to facilitate discussions. This leadership style echoes Huizingas concept of play as an endeavor focused on maintaining harmony within the group.
Reimagining Leadership Through Play
By drawing inspiration from Huizingas insights and the wisdom of cultures I propose we perceive leadership as a form of play that prioritizes cooperation and creativity, over command and competition.
This transition compels me to reassess the role of leadership—not as a competition, for power based on dominance. As an endeavor where the leaders task is to inspire, guide and nurture a sense of belonging in the group.
Present day leaders who value the aspect of leadership can establish settings that encourage inclusiveness, innovation and collaboration. This method in my view could result in communities that prioritize the welfare of all members over success. It also sets the stage for leadership in confronting intricate global issues.
In environments this shift might involve departing from financial gains and market control in favor of long term viability and corporate social responsibility. I propose that leaders should foster work atmospheres that promote creativity risk taking and shared decision making processes leading to organizations. In politics it could entail giving importance to diplomacy consensus building and integrating viewpoints into decision making procedures.
To sum up I believe that Huizingas idea of play within culture provides a framework, for reenvisioning leadership when compared with indigenous customs.
Viewing leadership as an creative endeavor than a zero sum competition can help me—and others—move away, from conventional Western leadership paradigms. This fresh perspective, inspired by Huizingas concepts and indigenous knowledge promotes inclusivity, sustainability and a community oriented approach in leadership methodologies.
By embracing this redefined style of leadership I believe we can not revolutionize our approach to leading but enhance how we support our communities. In a world grappling with challenges the significance of innovative and community driven leadership is more vital than ever. I am convinced that adopting an approach to leadership can pave the way for a future where collaborative efforts towards goals define success in leadership rather than mere rivalry.
References;
Huizinga, Johan. "Homo Ludens; A Study of the Play Element in Culture." Riverside Press, 1938.
Bird Rose, Deborah. "Nourishing Terrains; Australian Aboriginal Views of Landscape and Wilderness." Commission of Australian Heritage, 1996.
Lee Richard B., "The Kung San; Men, Women and Work, in a Foraging Society." Cambridge University Press, 1979.
Waters Anne (Ed.). "American Indian Thought; Philosophical Essays." Malden; Blackwell Publishing,2004.